AAR held that while pure supplies to governments and
local authorities are exempt from GST, composite
supplies are also exempt if goods are up to 25 per cent
of the total supply.
However, the company failed to produce a document to
prove this criterion.
In its last meeting in September, the GoM decided to seek legal opinion on
whether the prize money in online gaming and horse racing is covered within
“actionable claim”.
Leaving that aside, the AAR examined whether supply to SUDA constituted
supply to governments or local authorities.
AAR observed that SUDA is a registered society that was formed in the year
1991 under the aegis of the erstwhile Municipal Affairs Department, West
Bengal, with the objective to ensure the effective implementation of
different development programmes in urban areas of the state.
AAR said that SUDA, being a registered society, was not a panchayat or a
municipality, or any board or cantonment. Besides, no documents had been
produced wherefrom it could be established that SUDA was an authority
that is legally entitled to and entrusted by the government with the
control or management of a local fund.
Sandeep Sehgal, tax partner at AKM Global, said the ruling of West
Bengal AAR has taken the view that where the services are not provided
directly to a local authority, they shall not be eligible for exemption.
"Hence, even though the project is for public welfare, since the
immediate recipient of service is not any arm of the government, the
exemption shall not be allowed in this case for such services," he said.
Source:::
BUSINESS STANDARD,
dated 19/11/2022.